This is a ruling on two different preliminary objections.
The first preliminary objection is against this application filed by the two
applicants, basing on a single point of law that this application is time bared
in view of paragraph 5 of part III of the schedule to Cap. 89. The second, was
filed by the applicants against the joint counter affidavit filed by the second
and third Respondents. It is based on the sole ground that the jurat of
attestation on the said counter affidavit is incurably defective as it does no
state how the Commissioner for Oaths came to identify the deponent of the same;
Each side of the Preliminary objection countered the preliminary objections
raised by the other side.