In an x parte hearing judgment was pronounced in favour
of the Plaintiff who became a Decree Holder. The Defendant/Judgment Debtor
filed an application under certificate of urgency praying for, inter alia,
stay of execution pending the determination of his main application inter parties
for leave to file his application to set aside the ex-parte judgment out
of the prescribed time limit. Subsequently, the Plaintiff/Decree Holder filed
his application for execution of a decree amounting to 16,185,922/= and later
unceremoniously filed another decree showing 20,243,548/= in the same file.
Both magistrates ordered for execution before hearing the Defendant/Judgment
Debtor’s application without giving any reason or viable explanation. The
Defendant/Judgment Debtor applied for revision of the order of execution.