These two appeals involve the same Respondent and they are over the same subject matter, hence, with the consent of the parties, they were consolidated. During hearing of the Appeal, the Counsel for the Appellants submitted that the trial Tribunal was not properly constituted since it was not sitting with two assessors as legally required and that the judgment did not contain facts, and reasons behind its decisions contrary to section 23 (1) (2), and 24 of the Land Disputes Courts Act [Cap 216 R.E. 2002].